Help this open access journal plan their upcoming Open Source Strategy issue The TIM Review is an open access journal with an upcoming
Open Source Strategy issue they want you to contribute to. Mekki
MacAulay is the guest editor for the issue, and in this interview find
out more about the journal, this issue, and how you can share your
expertise on the subject.
One of the pillars of the open source way is community, so I was
quite pleased when Chris McPhee, the Editor-in-Chief of the journal Technology Innovation Management Review, reached out to me to thank me for including the TIM Review in my recent article about open access journals.
The TIM Review has an open access policy that makes it a great place to
share ideas with the broader open source community and aligns it with
two pillars of the open source way: open exchange and participation.
Attitudes and policies are shifting dramatically in favor of open
data, as funders, publishers and researchers alike acknowledge that the
benefits data sharing brings to science and biomedical discovery far
outweigh the risks. I’ll provide a basic introduction to data sharing
benefits and policies, and the resources available here at UCSF to
support data sharing. So, why share your data? Well, it’s good for science.
Data sharing supports data reuse, which can accelerate the pace of
scientific discovery. From a funder’s perspective, data reuse increases
the impact of their investment. Reanalysis of publicly available data
helps confirm original results and helps researchers gain confidence in
their novel discoveries. Publicly available datasets help train the next
generation of researchers by enabling them to get their feet wet in an
experimental or data analysis method that may be new to them. Public
datasets are also key assets in the development of novel data analysis
algorithms and software. Open data sharing also supports research
reproducibility and discourages fraud.
Psychologists have demonstrated the value of diversity—particularly
diversity of viewpoints—for enhancing creativity, discovery, and problem
solving. But one key type of viewpoint diversity is lacking in academic
psychology in general and socialpsychology in particular: political
diversity. This article reviews the available evidence and finds support
for four claims: 1)Academic psychology once had considerable political
diversity, but has lost nearly all of it in the last 50 years; 2) This
lack of political diversity can undermine the validity of social
psychological science via mechanisms such as the embedding of liberal
values into research questions and methods, steering researchers away
from important but politically unpalatable research topics, and
producing conclusions that mischaracterize liberals and conservatives
alike; 3) Increased political diversity would improve social
psychological science by reducing the impact of bias mechanisms such as
confirmation bias, and by empowering dissenting minorities to improve
the quality of the majority’s thinking; and 4) The underrepresentation
of non-liberals in social psychology is most likely due to a combination
of self-selection, hostile climate, and discrimination. We close
with recommendations for increasing political diversity in social
psychology
The Intellectual Property & Science business of Thomson Reuters
has announced its collaboration with Times Higher Education to power
the latter's BRICS and Emerging Economies Rankings. Thomson Reuters
InCites data, the world's leading research evaluation platform and home
to Global Institutional Profiles, is the benchmarking engine behind this
Times Higher Education ranking. Thomson Reuters also continues to power
several other Times Higher Education rankings, as well as working with
other ranking providers.
For more than a decade, Thomson Reuters has supported Shanghai Jiao Tong
University's esteemed Academic Ranking of World Universities. Earlier
this year, Thomson Reuters announced its collaboration with U.S. News
& World Report to power the organization's Best Global University
Rankings. Thomson Reuters also works with Russia's Round University
Research Group to provide content and first level analysis for its Round
University Ranking (RUR); URAP for the Middle East Technical University
in Turkey; CWTS for its Leiden Ranking; U-Multirank for its European
Commission Funded Consortia; and with the National Taiwan University
Rankings. Thomson Reuters also collaborates with many evaluation and
policy groups around the globe, such as Japan's National Institute of
Science and Technology Policy (NISTEP) to determine the impact of the
nation's scientific and technological efforts.
InCites, the evaluation and benchmarking engine from Thomson Reuters,
uses the industry's most trusted content and proven citation metrics
from the Web of Science as the foundation for objective analytics to
evaluate research output, performance and trends, as well as understand
the scope of an organization's scholarly contributions, by individual or
team.
Taking pride in their responsibility to ensure equal and open access to
information for people regardless of age, race or ethnicity, ability,
primary language or socioeconomic background, these librarians believe
they are part of a necessary social revolution supporting some of the
most underserved populations in the nation.
Harvard University says it can't afford journal publishers' prices
University wants scientists to make their research open access and resign from publications that keep articles behind paywalls
“The world’s entire scientific and cultural heritage, published over
centuries in books and journals, is increasingly being digitized and
locked up by a handful of private corporations.”
The
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), the
world’s largest general scientific society, has chosenthe RightsLink
for Open Access platform from Copyright
Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), a global licensing and content
solutions organization, to handle Article Processing Charges (APCs) for Science
Advances.
Science Advances, AAAS’s first online, fully Open Access journal,
features well-executed, important research across the entire range of
scholarly pursuits, including computer, engineering, environmental life,
mathematical, physical, and social sciences.
RightsLink for Open Access streamlines the entire author fee transaction
for Open Access charges, page charges, color charges, and more, giving
publishers a robust pricing, discount and collections engine. It will
work with AAAS’s manuscript management and production systems through
CCC’s integration with Aries
Systems’ Editorial Manager, which allows scholarly publishers a
seamless way to collect APCs from within the Editorial Manager workflow.
This will provide AAAS’s authors an easy-to-use platform for submitting
publication charges. World’s Largest General Scientific Society to Use RightsLink® for Open Access to Streamline the Entire Author Fee Transaction for Science Advances
“How are we conceptualizing the role of the library as it
relates to the mission of the college? Twenty first-century colleges
are made up of all kinds of media—that’s a fact and that’s, generally
speaking, a good thing—but I think the concern really has to do with
what the balance is of different kinds of resources for an institution
like ours and what are the criteria that are being used to decide how
that balance is being established for us?” Castelli said.
For die-hard Albert Einstein fans
that have always wanted to know more about the life of reputable
theoretical physicist, a massive new archive
of digitised files stemming from his life and works will let you do
just that.
Released 5 December by Princeton University, the project,
entitled The Digital Einstein Papers is an open-access
site for all the papers that Einstein ever wrote.
Princeton University has created and released an open-access collection of thousands of documents by theoretical physicist and philosopher of Science Albert Einstein.
MOSCOW,
December 6 (Sputnik) Princeton University Press has unveiled its
Digital Einstein Papers collection, an open-access site containing
thousands of documents by famous theoretical physicist and philosopher
of science Albert Einstein, the New York Times reported.
A collaborative project to study over 80,000 documents left behind by
Albert Einstein has been underway since 1986, jointly carried out by
Princeton and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Einstein willed the
latter university the rights to his work. The online project has made
about 5,000 documents available. Published earlier in book form, the
papers presently comprise 13 volumes; a total of 30 volumes are planned.
Thousands more documents will become available over time as they are
studied and categorized by scholars.
The launch of the Digital Einstein Papers
includes more than 5,000 documents that span the first 44 years of
Albert Einstein’s life. As the organizations collaborating on the
project -- the California Institute of Technology (the project’s home),
the Hebrew University of Jerusalem (which houses the Albert Einstein
Archives) and Princeton University Press -- work to sort through tens of
thousands of articles and letters, the website will grow to one day
feature what the publisher said may be the first free digital collection
of a prominent scientist’s complete works.
“The best Einstein source is now available to everyone,
everywhere through the web,” said John D. Norton, a University of
Pittsburgh professor of history and philosophy of science who wrote his
dissertation on the history of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.
“This is a great moment for Einstein scholarship.”
So perhaps the goal isn’t commercial
success, but the dissemination of knowledge? That seems
reasonable—except for the fact that university press books are quite
pricey. My own book is around $25 for a paperback—not exorbitant, but a long way from free. Other academic interest books can induce sticker shock; Adam Jones’ wonderful Gender Inclusive
is just shy of $50 on Amazon for the paperback; the hardback is a
whopping $135. Even $50 is enough to buy a coffee-table book indulgence,
not a slim paperback non-fiction volume, however brilliant. (And Jones’
book isn’t even published by an academic press; it’s by Routledge.)
So if academic books aren’t exactly
commercial endeavors, and they aren’t exactly providing knowledge for
the masses, what are they doing, exactly?
15 December 2014 According to conservative estimates, the UK’s higher education
institutions are paying £160m per year for subscriptions to
peer-reviewed academic journals; Research Libraries UK (RLUK) puts the
figure even higher, at £192m. These are significant ongoing costs that
reflect the central importance to UK research of having the widest
possible access to articles in scholarly journals.
Moving On, Open Access and Science Communication Impact
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/absolutely-maybe/2014/12/15/moving-on-open-access-and-science-communication-impact/ Still, it’s relatively easy to be an open access advocate, when you’re a
senior scientist who long ago opted for the public science agency
road. There was one last tie to that world, though, and it’s been
increasingly uncomfortable: blogging for a part of the Nature Publishing
Group. It’s been a privilege to be part of a magazine with such a long
history
Ethics network that seeks free and open communications turns 10
"Globethics.net has grown during the last 10 years on the basis of a
commitment to open access, to the sharing of knowledge and information,"
for the benefit of all," said the founder of Globethics.net, Christoph
Stückelberger.
"The need and the demand are there for resources that are freely available, especially in developing and emerging economies."
The journal Nature announced last week it will offer free access to a number of its articles online.
It’s
a move the journal said is a result of research funders "increasingly
mandating that scientists make their papers free to read, download and
reuse," but there are some strings attached. Articles can’t be copied,
printed, or downloaded. They need to be read in a proprietary
screen-view format, and can only be accessed through a special type of
link.
All articles submitted from 20 October 2014 will be published under an open-access model. The publication costs for authors will amount to USD 5,200 ...
‘Nature’ journals now free, as open access gains steam
The public now has unprecedented access to dozens more research journals, including the prestigious Nature,
as publisher Macmillan announced that 49 of its titles will be
available through a free content-sharing model, writes Jeff John Roberts
for Gigaom.
Under the terms of a one-year pilot programme, journal subscribers and
media outlets will be able to create links to articles from the journals
– which also include Nature Medicine and Nature Genetics – on ReadCube, a platform for viewing and annotating PDFs, and share them with anyone on the web.
“[It] marks an attempt to let scientists freely read and share articles
while preserving [Nature Publishing Group or] NPG’s primary source of
income – the subscription fees libraries and individuals pay to gain
access to articles,” the publisher explained. Full report on the Gigaom site
Earlier this week the publisher Macmillan announced
(in somewhat breathless prose) that subscribers to 49 of its Nature
journals would be able to share links to the full text of articles that
would otherwise be locked behind a subscription paywall.
At its core, JournalClick automates the
work of finding relevant research and sends content directly to
libraries and their users. While manual searching is incredibly valuable
JournalClick’s ability to push relevant articles as they are published
is set to help searchers save a huge amount of time as well as ensure
that they have access to all the latest content at their fingertips.
Read more at
http://www.virtual-strategy.com/2014/12/09/journalclick-launches-library-services-open-access-world#Zh0cyixYwAmYwCD7.99
Stephen Curry The subscription model was founded on a great leap forward in technology
– the printing press – and has served the research community well for
over 300 years. The quid pro quo in which authors and reviewers
worked for free while publishers took care of the technical side of
production and distribution, and covered their costs by charging
subscriptions, worked well – or well enough – for all that time. But the
digitisation of words and images, the ease-of-use of modern software
and the awesome dissemination power of the web has prompted a
reassessment of research publishing and of the relationship between
researchers and publishers. The web is also expanding the demand for
research publications among special interest groups such as
policymakers, small businesses, charities and the general public. These
groups increasingly want access, either directly or mediated by news
outlets or bloggers who have access to the literature and the ability to
recast it into more digestible forms.
When
it comes to clinical research, the participation of the people being
treated—the patients—usually ends by the time the study is submitted to a
journal. A few U.K.-based publishers are now looking to change that.
Last month, BioMed Central, an open-access publisher, announced that in 2015 it will launch the journal Research Involvement and Engagement, which will closely collaborate with patients in all aspects of its editorial processes, including peer review.
The new journal aims to capture the contributions of nonacademics to
scientific research; according to Stephens, academic evaluation of
public and patient involvement in science has been conducted for many
years, but no journal was devoted to the theme, commonly known as PPI.
The backers of the new journal point to a 2010 paper in Health Expectations
as the type of work they hope to publish. The study offered guidelines
for appraising the quality and impact of user involvement in published
papers and grant applications. The guidelines represented a
collaboration between patients and academics—several authors were
patients. But according to Daniel Shanahan, associate publisher for
medical evidence at BioMed Central in London, the study would
have benefited from patient peer review. “In the case of this article, a
lay reviewer would have been able to offer valuable insights as to the
quality and potential impact of user involvement, which would help
improve the overall quality of the article,” he suggests.
New open access book series Simula SpringerBriefs on Computing introduces essentials of computing science.Springer and Simula have launched a new book series, Simula
SpringerBriefs on Computing, which aims to provide introductions to
select research in computing. The series presents both a
state-of-the-art disciplinary overview and raises essential critical
questions in the field. Published by SpringerOpen, all Simula
SpringerBriefs on Computing are open access, allowing for faster sharing
and wider dissemination of knowledge. Under this agreement and model,
authors also retain copyright.
In October 2013 Italy enacted a law containing the first national regulations about the open-access availability of publicly-funded research results (publications).This contribution examines how these new regulations match with the specific situation of that open-access pioneering discipline which is astrophysics. LibGuide on Open Access (OA), Access to Knowledge (A2K) and Scholarly Communication LibGuide on Open Access (OA), Access to Knowledge (A2K) and Scholarly Communication. I hope you will find these resources useful. Should you have any queries, or should you want to add other useful references to this Guide, please contact Denise Nicholson (see Profile for details) Amsterdam, July 23, 2014 Elsevier, a world-leading provider of scientific, technical and medical information products and services, today announced that QUOSA, its literature management solution, and Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) have extended their relationship to support greater compliance in the use of full text articles within corporate or institutional environments. Using CCC's rights advisory API, QUOSA customers who are also CCC licensees can view their license rights directly from QUOSA at no extra cost to the user. - See more at: http://www.elsevier.com/about/press-releases/science-and-technology/quosa-and-copyright-clearance-center-expand-access-to-compliant-literature-with-integrated-rights-management#sthash.8oh8D2sx.dpuf
International Journal of Antennas and Propagation is a peer-reviewed, openaccess journal that publishes original research articles as well as review ...
The SCOAP3 initiative has converted to Open Access the majority of the literature in High-Energy Physics through a partnership of libraries, publishers ...
We follow the Gold Open Access way in journal publishing: Authors publish in Redfame journals that provide immediate open access to all of their ...
SAGE Open Access Initiatives
SAGE is the world’s largest independent academic publisher and is committed to global dissemination of research. We have published open access journals for a number of years with the goal of disseminating vital research to the broadest community. SAGE’s mission is founded in the belief that education is intrinsically valuable, and the dissemination of useable knowledge is a key foundation in building a healthy society.
SAGE supports both gold open access publication and green open access archiving:
SAGE Choice is offered on all SAGE’s traditional subscription journals and allows authors to make their published article freely available for article processing charge
Springer is celebrating the milestone of 200,000 open access articles published to date. The articles, published acrossBioMed Central andSpringerOpen are freely available and published under a Creative Commons (CC) license.
Springer now has 417 open access journals publishing across all areas of science – 265 at BioMed Central and 152 at SpringerOpen. In addition, SpringerOpen recently published its 35th open access book...... READ MORE
Hydra offers a core repository solution which can be adapted to meet different needs. It is open source software released under the Apache 2.0 licence, originally developed by the Hydra Project. The Project now has 21 Partners and a wide range of users internationally working together as a community to add to Hydra's capability. It seems to me that preprint repositories may be quite useful in some circumstances but I have not used them personally. I would therefore love to hear from any info pros in Australia who have used arXiv or RePec or institutional repositories or other repositories for research for their clients, How useful were they? Some of them seem to have quite deep archives but I would have expected preprints to be especially useful for very recent information.
Japan's National Institute for Materials Science (NIMS) and the Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (Empa) have signed a 5-year collaborative agreement to co-publish the open access journal Science and Technology of Advanced Materials (STAM).Japan's National Institute for Materials Science (NIMS) and the Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (Empa) have signed a 5-year collaborative agreement to co-publish the open access journal Science and Technology of Advanced Materials (STAM). [30 Jan 2014]
http://www.manmonthly.com.au/news/japan-switzerland-announce-publishing-collaboratio
Arctic Science will be on exhibit at ArcticNet’s international Arctic Change 2014 conference taking place December 8-12, 2014 in Ottawa. Arctic Science
is the first fully “gold” open access journal offered by Canadian
Science Publishing (CSP). It will maintain the high quality editorial
standards of our other NRC Research Press journals, while providing
free, immediate public access to the final published article. For an
introductory period, article processing charges (APCs) in Arctic Science
will be waived.
As collaborative, international scientific discovery and research in
the Arctic is becoming ever more critical, we found there was an
immediate need for an interdisciplinary Canadian‐based, openly
accessible, science journal focused specifically on Arctic science.
Pathogenesis (Elsevier)http://www.pathogenesisjournal.com/[published on behalf of The Royal College of Pathologists, a professional membership organization committed to setting and maintaining professional standards and promoting excellence in the practice of Pathology] will provide a home for research covering all areas of illness and normal cellular and molecular development in human and veterinary disease. The journal Pathogenesis will publish peer reviewed original scientific research articles and high quality reviews, editorials and letters to the editor which report on multidisciplinary areas of Molecular and Diagnostic Pathology, Cellular Mechanisms as well as aspects of Haematology, Proteomics, Virology, Microbiology and Chemical Pathology. [29 Jan 2014] http://online.wsj.com/article/PR-CO-20140129-908657.html
The Open Source Initiative (OSI) is a non-profit corporation with global scope formed to educate about and advocate for the benefits of open source and to build bridges among different constituencies in the open source community. Project Gutenberg Science Fiction
Internet Archive
Internet Public libraryThe Internet Public Library is a public service organization and a learning/teaching environment founded at the University of Michigan Schokk of Information
If you have some more such sites, please let me know
The UK government has announced that it will make publicly funded scientific research available for anyone to read for free, accepting recommendations in a report on open access by Dame Janet Finch.
This will likely see a major increase in the number of taxpayer-funded research papers freely available to the public.
“Removing paywalls that surround taxpayer funded research will have real economic and social benefits.
Science Minister David Willetts said:
“Removing paywalls that surround taxpayer funded research will have real economic and social benefits. It will allow academics and businesses to develop and commercialise their research more easily and herald a new era of academic discovery.
"This development will provide exciting new opportunities and keep the UK at the forefront of global research to drive innovation and growth.”
http://www.bis.gov.uk/news/topstories/2012/Jul/government-to-open-up-publicly-funded-research Open Access on Wikipedia OASIS aims to provide an authoritative ‘sourcebook’ on Open Access, covering the concept, principles, advantages, approaches and means to achieving it. The site highlights developments and initiatives from around the world, with links to diverse additional resources and case studies. As such, it is a community-building as much as a resource-building exercise. Users are encouraged to share and download the resources provided, and to modify and customize them for local use. Open Access is evolving, and we invite the growing world-wide community to take part in this exciting global movement.
Tensions between publishers and funding bodies over open access to research papers have flared up again after the Publishers Association accused Research Councils UK of riding roughshod over publishers' concerns in a new draft policy on open access. see news
Australia’s National Health and Medical Research Council said it would
require that the published results of all research it helps pay for be
made publicly accessible in institutional repositories within 12
months of publication. The policy, which is to take effect in July,
puts the council in line with other major supporters of scientific
research, including the National Institutes of Health and Britain’s
Welcome Trust.
Researchers publish their results to establish their own claim to the research and to enable other researchers to build upon them. In the case of journal articles, only the richest institutions have been able to afford a reasonable proportion of all the scholarly journals published and so learning about and accessing such articles has not always been easy for most researchers. Open Access changes all this.
What Open Access is
The Open Access research literature is composed of free, online copies of peer-reviewed journal articles and conference papers as well as technical reports, theses and working papers. In most cases there are no licensing restrictions on their use by readers. They can therefore be used freely for research, teaching and other purposes.
What Open Access is not
There are various misunderstandings about Open Access. It is not self-publishing, nor a way to bypass peer-review and publication, nor is it a kind of second-class, cut-price publishing route. It is simply a means to make research results freely available online to the whole research community.
How is Open Access provided?
Open Access can be provided by various means. A researcher can place a copy of each article in an Open Access archive or repository or can publish articles in Open Access journals. In addition, a researcher may place a copy of each article on a personal or departmental website. Whilst all three routes to Open Access ensure that far more users can access such articles than if they were hidden away in subscription-based journals, the first two constitute much more systematic and organised approaches than the third and maximise the chance of other researchers locating and reading articles.
Open Access archives or repositories are digital collections of research articles that have been placed there by their authors. In the case of journal articles this may be done either before (preprints) or after publication (postprints). This is known as ‘self-archiving’. These repositories expose the metadata of each article (the title, authors, and other bibliographic details) in a format compliant with the Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH). To access the contents of these archives, you can use Google or one of the specialised search engines for a more focused and efficient search. The latter systematically harvest the contents of the archives worldwide, forming a database of current global research. Open Access repositories may be multidisciplinary and located in universities or other research-based institutions, or they may be centralised and subject-based, such as the one covering certain areas of physics and related disciplines, called arXiv. By the beginning of 2005, there were almost 40 Open Access archives in the UK, and more universities and research institutes are planning to launch their own. A list of Open Access archives in the UK is maintained by the Eprints.org site at Southampton University. If your institution does not have an archive, extensive information on how to set one up can be found on that website. Self-archiving is an international movement that is developing fast, and some grant funders are also now planning central archives to house the articles of their grant-holders.
If you are concerned that your journal’s publisher may have copyright restrictions that would prevent you from self-archiving your articles, this will in most instances not be the case. Current publisher policies on self-archiving and copyright are detailed on the SHERPA project website at Nottingham University.
Open Access journals are peer-reviewed journals whose articles may be accessed online by anyone without charge. In many cases they may also be published in print. Some, mainly those published from a university department or with substantial subsidy, make no author or page charges. Others levy a charge for publishing an article, turning on its head the traditional model where a library pays for access to the contents of a journal through a subscription. This charge may be paid by the author(s) but in most cases it is financed by a research grant or institutional funds. Your institution may already have taken the decision to pay for Open Access articles to be published, or your grant-awarding body may have adopted this as one of its policies. A list of grant-awarding bodies that explicitly permit funds to be used for this purpose is maintained on the BioMed Central website. BioMed Central is a well-known Open Access publisher with over 100 journals in its portfolio. Other examples are the journals from the Public Library of Science, such as PLoS Medicine, PLoS Biology. In the case of an author’s financial hardship, BioMed Central, PLoS and other Open Access journal publishers will waive the publication fee. Fees levied by Open Access journals vary quite markedly but, as a guideline, BioMed Central charges £330 per article for most of its journals, and PLoS charges US$1,500 (approx. £800). In 2003 JISC secured a deal with BioMed Central on behalf of UK institutions to waive author fees for over 90 biomedical journals.
A comprehensive list of Open Access journals in all subject areas is maintained by the University of Lund. In early 2005 this list contained over 1,400 journals. Many of these Open Access journals have impact factors and are indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information for its Web of Knowledge/Web of Science service. At June 2004, 239 Open Access journals were in this category.
Another form of Open Access is found in ‘hybrid’ journals: these are publications that will make an article accessible to everyone online without charge if the author opts to pay for publication. An example of a hybrid journal is the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, which will make an article Open Access for a fee of US$1,000.
Why should Authors Provide Open Access to their Work?
There is accumulating evidence that shows that research articles that have been self-archived are cited more often than those that have not. Across most subject areas there is at least a twofold increase in citation rate. In some subject areas it is even higher. This form of Open Access means that research has much more impact than before. Moreover, the research cycle – where work is published, read, cited and then built upon by other researchers – is enhanced and accelerated when results are available on an Open Access basis. Would you not prefer to be able to access all the articles you need to read and use for your research, easily and without restriction?
This paper has been written by Alma Swan of Key Perspectives Ltd on behalf of JISC and produced and edited by Sara Hassen and the JISC Communications Team.
The ePrints UK Project is developing national, discipline-focused services for accessing e-prints from open archive repositories: www.rdn.ac.uk/projects/eprints-uk
Open Access Archives and Self-Archiving
The Eprints.org site has general information about Open Access archives, including a list of existing archives and a handbook on how to set one up: www.eprints.org
Publishers cry foul over RCUK access plans. 22 MARCH 2012 | BY PAUL JUMP
NATURE | NEWS Researchers opt to limit uses of open-access publications Advocates of open publishing fret that misunderstandings lead scientists to choose restrictive licenses. Richard Van Noorden 06 February 2013
NATURE | COMMENT Science publishing: Open access must enable open use Cameron NeylonNature 492, 348–349 (20 December 2012)
International Research: Journal of Library and Information Science is an international peer-reviewed online journal in the field of Library and Information Science publishing original research papers, survey reports, and reviews & opinions pertaining to the subject.
For die-hard 
